CONCLUSION

   It's easy to see from all the charts today that the latest 232-layer 3D QLC NAND flash by YMTC does a very good job in both read & write numbers which is also why other models also based on the MaXio MAP1602 fall slightly back in some tests, the popular NM790 by Lexar included. QLC NAND however has always suffered from a single issue which is also obviously present here as well, endurance. For example, the 2TB variant of the SSD FX700 series features an TBW of 800 whereas the NM790 and even the GM7 feature a TBW of 1500 and 1200 respectively (not a small difference). Now do i expect these numbers to actually make a difference for most consumers? Probably not, still endurance is something i happen to put much weight on (yes, even more than performance since my work depends on stability) so for such people QLC NAND is probably not the way to go.

   In terms of pricing the HP SSD FX700 2TB has an MSRP of USD99.99 (wasn’t able to find it on any of the known e-tailers so MSRP is all I have right now) which is very good considering its performance. Yes, endurance may not be the best out there but for the vast majority of consumers that will not matter much and since the SSD FX700 does deliver in performance, features and price it deserves the Golden Award.

PROS

- Good Overall Performance (For a DRAMLess Drive)
- Up To 4TB Capacity
- Graphene Laced Pad (Reduced Temperatures)
- 5 Year Limited Warranty
- Price (For Some)

CONS

- Current Availability
- 3D QLC NAND Endurance (For Some)